[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [HLL] Comments on modem speed & mission goal
On Mon, 12 Jan 1998, Frank Rieger wrote:
> >But still 14.4 would be nice if it fits (and Volker seems pretty sure that
> >it will ;-) because 14.4 is usually what you get over international
> OK, I forgot the international line-quality. Is this still that bad?
It is on the transatlantic links. The transpacific links are better,
since there is some overcapacity, so they don't turn up the compression
quite as high.
> >Wild idea (optional feature!): How about an uncompressed mode if it sees
> >enough bandwidth, so one could use these hayes compatible async ISDN
> >terminal adapters.
> Good idea, assumed, that ISDN will be the basic interface at least in
> Europe for the time to come.
What to do when you have a B channel to work with would be the least of my
worries. I would keep it simple and keep it operating under less than
ideal line conditions. To get the most benefits for everybody, that
probably means a 14.4 modem with a 9600 baud (perhaps even
lower?) fallback mode. Beware of feature creep, the death of many
-- Lucky Green <firstname.lastname@example.org> PGP v5 encrypted email preferred.
"Tonga? Where the hell is Tonga? They have Cypherpunks there?"